Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Virginia Mason Medical Center

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 3, 2002No. 48156-8-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

— In this case, in response to the spouse’s concern that her husband’s death was imminent, the doctor allegedly told the patient and his family that the patient was not going to die within the year. Regardless of how this assurance by the doctor is interpreted, it is not a legally enforceable promise under RCW 7.70.030(2). A cause of action under RCW 7.70.030(2) requires an express undertaking or promise to obtain a specific result or cure through a procedure or a course of treatment. We reverse the trial court’s order granting summary judgment on liability and on remand direct entry of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rettkowski v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Ellis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Staats v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Plumbing Shop, Inc. v. PittsWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Yeager v. DunnavanWashington Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. SavidgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. Young v. SavidgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Hansen v. Virginia Mason Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Cole v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API