Legal Opinion
Plumbing Shop, Inc. v. Pitts
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1965No. 37594PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
— Two aspects of contract law are involved in this appeal: (1) The legal implications, if any, arising from the use of a subcontractor’s bid-offer by a general contractor in the submission of an over-all bid, and (2) the role of custom and usage in the proof of implied contracts.
The salient facts of this controversy are as follows: The plaintiff, The Plumbing Shop, Inc., a mechanical subcontracting firm, commenced this action for damages for breach of an alleged implied contract with Guy A. Pitts and Mrs. Guy A. Pitts, husband and wife, as general contractors. The plaintiff subcontractor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Milone & Tucci, Inc. v. Bona Fide Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
- Washington Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. DukeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Loewi v. LongWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- O'BRIEN v. SchultzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- McDonnell v. Coeur d'Alene Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Earl M. Jorgensen Co. v. Mark Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- Savoca Masonry Co., Inc. v. Homes & Son Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Mitchell v. SiqueirosIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- AROK Construction Co. v. Indian Construction ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Leonard v. Washington Employers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.