Legal Opinion

May Co. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1982No. 81-1746PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The first issue presented for resolution herein is whether the transactions in question are “sales” within the meaning of R.C. 5739.01(B). In part, R.C. 5739.01(B) provides that:

*8“ ‘Sale’ and ‘selling’ include all transactións by which title or possession, or both, of tangible personal property, is or is to be transferred, * * * for a consideration in any manner, whether absolutely or conditionally, whether for a price or rental, in money or by exchange, and by any means whatsoever ***. *** Other than as provided in this section, ‘sale’ and ‘selling’ do not include *** personal service…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Accountant's Computer Services, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Wilson v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Rice v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Co-operative Pure Milk Ass'n v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Compuserve, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Craftsman Type, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Albright v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Copperweld Steel Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API