Legal Opinion

United States v. Finley Hilliard

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 10, 2014No. 12-20804PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge:

In 1995, J. Howard Marshall, II (“J. Howard”) made what the IRS later determined was an indirect gift of Marshall Petroleum, Inc. (“MPI”) stock to MPI’s other shareholders: (1) Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens (“Stevens”), J. How'ard’s former wife, who was the beneficiary of a trust that was funded by MPI stock; (2) E. Pierce Marshall (“E. Pierce”), J. Howard’s son; (3) Elaine T. Marshall (“Elaine”), E. Pierce’s wife; (4) the Preston Marshall Trust (“Preston Trust”), which had been formed for the benefit of J. Howard’s grandson, Preston Marshall; and (5) the E.…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dallas County, Texas v. MERSCORP, IncorporaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Finley HilliardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  3. In re Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens Living TrustLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. United States v. LouisianaDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2016
  5. United States v. Finley HilliardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API