Freeze Ex Rel. Freeze v. Congleton
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.
The sole question presented is whether the evidence offered by plaintiff is sufficient, when taken in the light most favorable to him, to support a finding of negligence on the part of defendant which proximately caused injury to plaintiff. 6 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Negligence, § 30, p. 64.
Plaintiff concedes the general rule that a social guest in a home is a licensee and not an invitee. Murrell v. Handley, 245 N.C. 559, 96 S.E. 2d 717, and citations therein. However, plaintiff contends that where the guest is a child he should not be treated as a bare licensee.
The traditional treatment of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murrell v. HandleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Mattingly v. NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Jenkins v. Leftwich Electric CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Kirkman v. BaucomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DeHaven v. HoskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989