Legal Opinion

Freeze Ex Rel. Freeze v. Congleton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1969No. 6919SC320PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.

The sole question presented is whether the evidence offered by plaintiff is sufficient, when taken in the light most favorable to him, to support a finding of negligence on the part of defendant which proximately caused injury to plaintiff. 6 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Negligence, § 30, p. 64.

Plaintiff concedes the general rule that a social guest in a home is a licensee and not an invitee. Murrell v. Handley, 245 N.C. 559, 96 S.E. 2d 717, and citations therein. However, plaintiff contends that where the guest is a child he should not be treated as a bare licensee.

The traditional treatment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murrell v. HandleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Mattingly v. NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Jenkins v. Leftwich Electric CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Kirkman v. BaucomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DeHaven v. HoskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API