Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1927No. 4756PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

On September 1, 1923, defendant in error (referred to herein as the “surety”) duly issued to the Ohio Industrial Endowment Fund Company (later referred to as the “employer”) a bond to reimburse that company, within a limited amount stated in the bond, for such pecuniary losses as the latter might sus-, tain during one year then next ensuing by any aet of larceny or embezzlement of money, securities, or other personal property of the employer, or in the employer’s possession, and for whieh the employer might be legally liable, committed by any of its employees named in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. StarbirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Guarantee Co. of North America v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Southern Pacific R. Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. National Surety Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. Allen v. Dutchess County Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Davis & Sons, Inc. v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. Scheibel v. Agwilines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. National City Bank v. National Security Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  4. Anderson v. TwayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  5. Columbia Axle Co. v. American Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API