Allen v. Dutchess County Mutual Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, George Allen, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered -in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 18th day of November, 1902, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court after a trial at the Kings County Trial Term.
1Opinion of the Court
Jenks, J.:
The policy provides : “ No suit or action on this policy, for the recovery'of any claim, shall be sustainable in. any court of law Or equity until after full compliance by the insured with all the foregoing requirements, nor unless commenced within twelve, months next after-the fire.” The twelve months’ limitation began to run from the day of the fire. (King v. Watertown Fire Ins. Co., 47 *87Hun, 1; Cooper v. U. S. M. B. Assn., 132 N.Y. 334, 338 ; Joyce Ins. § 3190.) The cases cited contra by the learned counsel for the appellant (Hay v. Star Fire Insurance Co., 77 N. Y. 235 ; Steen v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Hay v. . Star Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Gibson Electric Co. v. Liverpooland London & Globe InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Todd v. Union Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Elting v. DaytonNew York Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Proc v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Cohen v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Scheibel v. Agwilines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Reynolds v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.