Legal Opinion

Toullerton v. Manchke

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 25, 1895No. 662PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

Appellant and one Huberich were pint owners of certain lots of lands in the city of San Antonio, and sold the same to George Blunck for ninety dollars cash, and twenty-two notes payable to their order, reserving the vendor’s hen in deed and notes to secure the payment of the latter. Afterwards Huberieh endorsed his half interest in the notes to appellant. Two of the notes were transferred to L. Manchke by appellant. Afterwards Blunck died, leaving eleven of the notes in the hands of Toullerton, and two bélonging to Manchke, unpaid. Manchke was appointed administrator,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robertson v. PaulTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Cannon v. McDanielTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. White v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Hamblen v. FoltsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Jenkins v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walton v. First National Bank of Trenton, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
  2. Van Valkenburgh v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Hudson v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. King v. BattagliaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. George v. First Nat. Bank of TuliaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API