Legal Opinion

Hamblen v. Folts

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1888No. 2320PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Appeal from Liberty. Tried below before the Hon. Edwin Hobby.

1Opinion of the Court

Maltbie, Judge.

Appellees Folts & Walsh sued appellants, who are the executors, devisees and vendees of Mrs. Annie E. Hamblen, to recover the amount of a note, and to foreclose the vendor’s lien on a tract of land in Liberty county, or if not en- ' titled to this relief, for a recovery of the land, averring that they own the superior title. The case was tried by the court, without a jury, and a general judgment rendered that appellees recover the land, unless appellants will pay off and discharge the note sued on, and interest, within ninety days from the rendition of the judgment.

It appears…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Russell & Seisfeld v. KirkbrideTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Rogers v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Pope v. BeauchampTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Adams v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Johnson v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  5. West v. First Bap. Ch. of TaftTexas Supreme Court · 1934

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API