Legal Opinion

Crozier v. Allen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Kent; Adsit, J. Case under 2 How. Stat. § 8806, by Alfred O. Crozier and another against Bernard Allen. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, C. J.

This suit is brought to recover treble damages, under section 8306, 2 How. Stat.

Defendant failed to pay rent when due. Notice to quit was served September 4th. He did not surrender possession. Plaintiffs on September 12th commenced summary proceedings to eject him. Summons was issued on the 12th, returnable the 17th. The officer, being unable to find the defendant, served the summons on Thursday, the 13th, by leaving a true copy of the same at his usual place of abode, in the manner provided by the statute, and made his return the same day. Defendant did not appear on the return day, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Chaddock v. BarryMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ehinger v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. City of Port Huron v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Lemon v. HamptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Detroit Trust Co. v. Doe (Agozzino)Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API