Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 29, 1917No. 22700PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Eighth Judicial Dis■trict Court, Parish of Jefferson; John E. Fleury, Judge. Edwin Austin was convicted of gaming by orally operating a betting book on a track in the parish of Jefferson, where a horse race was being run, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSommerville, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for gambling by orally operating a betting book on a track in tbe parish of Jefferson, where a horse race was being run.

The evil of gambling is noticed in the Constitution, which declares it to be a vice, and the Legislature is therein directed to pass laws to suppress it; and to the courts is given the authority to execute such laws by enforcing the penalties therein imposed for their violation.

There are many laws against gambling; and in 1904 the Legislature passed Act No. 127, p. 291, to suppress gambling on races in pool rooms and turf…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MaloneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. People Ex Rel. Lichtenstein v. . LanganNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. State v. BreffeihlSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  4. City of Shreveport v. MaloneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  5. City of Shreveport v. SchulsingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. Gandolfo v. Louisiana State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  3. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. Zuppardi v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  5. Bain v. GrillotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API