City of Shreveport v. Schulsinger
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from City Court of Shreveport; Cal. D. Hicks, Judge. A. Schulsinger and A. E. Maloney were charged with violating an ordinance of the city of Shreveport. Judgment for defendants, and the city appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, J.
Defendants, having been charged with operating and conducting a poolroom and turf exchange in Shreveport, outside of certain limits, in violation of a city ordinance, demurred, and' moved to quash the affidavit, on the grounds that the ordinance is unjust, discriminative, and oppressive, in that the limit prescription practically prohibits the business in which they are engaged, will render valueless or impair the value of personal property, including a lease, used and held by them for its purposes, and will deprive them of the means of livelihood; and *11that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of Shreveport v. MaloneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- State v. SaiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- State v. LahiffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.