Legal Opinion

Cliffside Park Realty Co. v. Borough of Cliffside

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 20, 1921PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On appeal from the Supreme Couit, in which court the following memorandum was filed by Mr. Justice Parker: “The writ removes for consideration an elaborate zoning ordinance of Cliffside Park, approved September 27th, 1920, and which was avowedly enacted, pursuant to the supplement to the ‘Home Rule act’ of 1917, which appears as chapter 210 of the laws of 1920. Pamph. L., p. loo.

Read the full summary

On appeal from the Supreme Couit, in which court the following memorandum was filed by Mr. Justice Parker: “The writ removes for consideration an elaborate zoning ordinance of Cliffside Park, approved September 27th, 1920, and which was avowedly enacted, pursuant to the supplement to the ‘Home Rule act’ of 1917, which appears as chapter 210 of the laws of 1920. Pamph. L., p. loo. Prosecutors own two blocks of land in the borough, laid out as building lots, and allege that the marketability of their lands is seriously affected by the restriction of said lauds to uses not forbidden by…

1Per curiam

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Hepeenheimer, JJ. 8.

For reversal—Kalisci-i, Ivatzenbach, White, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 5.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Civello v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Florentine v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. In Re MarkhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Bullock v. WoodingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API