Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Weinstein

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1969PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CURIAM.

The Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar has recommended to this court the permanent disbarment of Philip Weinstein upon findings by a trial committee that he was guilty of unprofessional conduct.

The accused challenges the findings and recommendation on two grounds: insufficient evidence of guilt, and unreasonable delay upon the part of the Bar in proceeding with the prosecution of his case after filing charges against him.

Of the twenty-five specifications of misconduct charged by the Bar, the trial committee found the accused guilty of seventeen, not guilty of seven, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Application for Reinstatement of BlackOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BlackOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. In re Complaint as to the Conduct of GronnertOregon Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoldsboroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Matter of WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Anne Arundel County Bar Ass'n v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. Fletcher Whaley Long v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API