Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Mobley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1918No. 9435PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Latimer County; W. H. Brown, Judge. Action by T. P. Mobley against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, and James W. Lusk and others, its receivers. Defendants’ motion to quash and set aside the service of summons overruled and judgment rendered for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

This action was filed by Mobley against the receivers of the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company and the company on the 8th day of February, 191G. Summons was issued and returned by the sheriff on February 10, 1916, and thereafter on March 11, 1916, the sheriff amended his return so as to show:

“Received this writ the 8th day of February, 1916, and served the same on the within-named defendant by delivering a copy thereof with all the indorsements thereof duly certified by me to be a true copy thereof, to J. W. Riley, of Bengal, in Latimer county, on the 9th day of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. B. F. Blaker & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Model LaundrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Swenson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Moore v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lakeview, Inc. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Schaff v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. RupeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API