Legal Opinion

Omaha Water Co. v. Schamel

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1906No. 2,068PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by an administrator, on behalf of the next of kin, to recover from the Omaha Water Company damages for the death of his intestate, Mrs. Annie Schamel, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of that company. The plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment which the deh fendant seeks to have reversed because of errors said to have occurred upon the trial.

Mrs. Schamel and others were holding a committee meeting in a third-story room of a building in Omaha, called the "Patterson Block,” when h fire, originating in the basement, was quickly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stokes v. SaltonstallSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Tilley v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Tilley v. . the H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1864
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. BaierNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. McGinn v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  2. Davis v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Kincade v. MiklesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  4. McKeown v. ArgetsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Wilson v. BassIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API