Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Baier
Nebraska Supreme Court
i Error from the district court of Otoe county. Tried, below before Chapman, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ryan, .0.
’ The defendant in error filed his petition in the district court of Otoe county, Nebraska, alleging’ in substance, that qn the 26th day of December, 1889, the Missouri Pacific Railway Company received one Katharine Baier as a pas*237senger on its said railroad from Nehawka to Lincoln; that at Weeping Water, to continue her journey, it was necessary for her to change from one of defendant’s cars to another, and said railway company was thereby bound to furnish her suitable means, time, and instructions to make said change; that it failed and neglected to do its duty in these matters, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cooper v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Waldele v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Pennsylvania Co. v. LillyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Tilson v. . TerwilligerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- A. & N. Railroad v. BaileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. BradyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. ZerneckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- City of Indianapolis v. KeeleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Sullivan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. MetcalfNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.