Legal Opinion

Wright v. Matthews

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 6, 1968No. Record 6974PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

Invoking our original jurisdiction, the petitioner William Ernest Wright seeks a writ of habeas corpus directing his release from a State farm where he is confined for failure to pay the costs of criminal prosecutions.

By a pro se petition, Wright first sought a writ of mandamus directing the judge of the Circuit Court of Washington County, who presided at Wright’s criminal trials, to release him from custody. We treated that petition as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and appointed Guy T. Tripp, III, Esquire, of the Richmond bar, as Wright’s counsel.

-Counsel filed an amended habeas…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Pollock v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. In re BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  4. State v. KilmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Commonwealth v. McCue's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BarklindWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Anderson v. EllingtonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1969
  4. State Ex Rel. Canterbury v. PaulWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State Ex Rel. Canterbury v. PaulWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API