Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Canterbury v. Paul

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1999No. 25890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYNARD, Justice:

In this petition for a writ of prohibition, we are asked to address a magistrate’s interpretation of W.Va.Code § 50-3-2 (1996), which requires magistrates to impose certain court costs upon conviction in criminal cases. The petitioner in this case, the West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority (Jail Authority), asserts that the respondent magistrate is wrongfully refusing to impose those statutory court costs.

After careful consideration of the arguments of the parties, we find that the magistrate’s refusal to impose those court costs ignores the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hoover v. BergerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Smith v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. CarterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State ex rel. West Virginia Secondary School Activities Commission v. OakleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. West Virginia Education Ass'n v. Consolidated Public Retirement BoardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. HowellColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Stern v. Chemtall Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. MyersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. William F. Crawford v. W. Va. Dept. of Corrections - Work ReleaseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State Ex Rel. Canterbury v. PaulWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API