Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Stolarz
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 4, 1993PublishedCited by 243 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
In this automobile insurance dispute, both Supreme Court and the Appellate Division concluded that there was a conflict between New York and New Jersey law, and that New York law should control. We conclude there is no such conflict, and in any event New Jersey law applies. Accordingly, we reverse.
I
On February 18, 1989, Kathleen Stolarz and her husband were injured in a two-car accident on Route 6 in Woodbury, New York. The Stolarz vehicle was a company car leased by her employer, Blue Cross/Blue Shield of New Jersey, and registered in New Jersey. New…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of SimmonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by243 opinions
- Matter of Allstate Ins. Co.(stolarz-Njm)New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Harris v. Provident Life And Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Curley v. AMR Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Lazard Freres & Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Protective Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- In Re Bank of America Corp. Securities, Derivative, & Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.