Legal Opinion
Bailey v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 19, 2013No. 11-770PublishedCited by 337 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
The Fourth Amendment guarantees the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. A search may be of a person, a thing, or a place. So too a seizure may be of a person, a thing, or even a place. A search or a seizure may occur singly or in combination, and in differing sequence. In some cases the validity of one determines the validity of the other. The instant case involves the search of a place (an apartment dwelling) and the seizure of a person. But here, though it is acknowledged that the search was lawful,.it does not follow that the seizure was lawful as well. The seizure of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by337 opinions
- Manuel v. City of JolietSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Byron Halsey v. Frank PfeifferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Maurice Lewis v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Shaun J. Matz v. Rodney KlotkaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Fernandez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
332 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.