In Re Horr
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
In our opinion the petition does not show any good ground for the issuance of either a writ of habeas corpus or a writ ofcertiorari.
To our minds the ordinance of the city and county of San Francisco here involved is not violative of any provision of either state or federal constitution, and is a valid enactment. The complaint in the police court stated facts sufficiently showing a public offense in view of the provisions of said ordinance. The claim that the police court erred in refusing to grant a transfer to another department of that court because of the alleged bias and prejudice of the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- In Re GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- In Re MoffettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- In Re HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- In Re CoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- In Re MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.