Legal Opinion

State v. Mollichi

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1997No. 64301-6PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

In this case, we must decide if the $300 restitution order entered against defendant Geoffray Mol-lichi is valid even though it was not entered at Mollichi’s disposition hearing, as prescribed in Washington’s Juvenile Justice Act of 1977. We also must determine if Molli-chi could waive the Act’s requirement for a disposition hearing. We hold that a restitution order not timely entered at a disposition hearing as set forth in RCW 13.40.150(3)0) and RCW 13.40.130(8)/JuCR 7.12(a) is invalid unless the juvenile waives the statutory requirements. The State here did not meet the Act’s requirements…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. KrallWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Human Rights Commission v. Cheney School District No. 30Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. ValdobinosWashington Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. DelgadoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Limstrom v. LadenburgWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API