Legal Opinion

Enterprise Sheet Metal Works v. Schendel

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1922No. 4,770PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ME. COMMISSIONEB LENTZ

prepared the opinion for the court.

In this action plaintiff seeks to recover of defendant $1,000, the par value of ten shares of plaintiff’s capital stock, upon a subscription contract therefor.

*531On a former appeal, this court held that the original complaint did not state a cause of action, for the reason that it did not disclose that all of the capital stock had been subscribed or that the implied condition of full subscription had been waived. Reference to the former opinion is made for a recital of the subscription agreement and a statement of principles which have now…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hager v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  2. California Southern Hotel Co. v. CallenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. International Fair & Exposition Ass'n v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Masonic Temple Ass'n v. ChannellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. Enterprise Sheet Metal Works v. SchendelMontana Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simmons v. LeightonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. First State Bank v. MussigbrodMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Sorrels v. RyanMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Mining Securities Co. v. WallMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Eckerson v. UtterDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API