Legal Opinion

Daigle v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 17, 1989No. 67212PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

This appeal arises from a negligence action wherein appellant, Richard Anthony Daigle, brought suit against Steve Allen Hamilton for injuries allegedly resulting from an automobile accident in 1984.

Although Mr. Hamilton was the named defendant on the petition, appellant never obtained service of process upon him. The appellant filed an amended petition which named appellee, American Deposit Insurance Company (American), as a defendant. The amended petition alleged that American was responsible to the appellant because American was Mr. Hamilton's insurer under an insurance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. DENCO BUS LINES, INC. v. HargisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Enders v. LongmireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Tidmore v. FullmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Jacobsen v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Blanke v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Broadway Clinic v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Fierro v. LINCOLN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
  4. Nichols Hills Physical Therapy v. GuthrieCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Campbell v. American International Group, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API