Legal Opinion

Duffy v. Gleason

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1900No. 3,235PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

Appellee recovered a judgment for damages for personal injuries resulting from a collision between a tugboat and a coal barge on the Ohio river. The errors assigned question the sufficiency of the complaint, the *181court’s ruling sustaining a demurrer to the second paragraph of answer, and overruling the motion for a new trial.

The only objection made to the sufficiency of the complaint is that it fails sufficiently to aver negligence. The injury arose from a collision between vessels, and it is quite true that the averment simply that there was a collision would not show negligence. But it is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton R. R. v. ChesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Schoonmaker v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Chappell v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Apperson v. LazroIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. FikeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Campbell v. Indianapolis & Northwestern Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Saginaw Bay Transportation Co. v. Portage Entry Quarries Co.Cuyahoga Circuit Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API