Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1931No. 320PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.
The appellant complains of a conviction and sentence upon an indictment which charged him with the unlawful possession of' whisky in Seminole county, Okl., where prior to statehood the aet was prohibited by federal' law.
One of the assignments of error challenges the validity of the Aet of June 30,. 1919, 41 Stat. 4 (25 USCA § 244), on which the indictment was based. But the act was-upheld by this court in Hodges et al. v. United States, 36 F.(2d) 356. That decision is undoubtedly sound, and we adhere to it.
The remaining assignments of error are predicated on certain…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Feinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- McNutt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ayers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. MaggioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Shepard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.