Legal Opinion

Shepard v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1933No. 564PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.

It must have been an undue zeal that prompted counsel in casting the imputation upon this court that it in any way prejudged appellant’s case, and found the errors justified in the “failures of counsel,” especially since this court passed over certain fatal objections to a review of the rulings upon the evidence and the instructions to the jury. Rule 11 of this court requires assignments on questions of evidence to quote the full substance of the evidence admitted or rejected. But there was a total omission to comply with the rule. The instructions are not subject to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Goldsby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. United States v. CroweCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  4. Aubrey McRae Luttrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API