Legal Opinion

Crutchfield v. Webster

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1912No. 1298PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Tulsa County Court; N. J. Gubser, Judge. Action by G. W. Webster and E. V. Hartman against J. M. Crutchfield. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, C. J.

On March 15, 1909, G. W. Webster and E. V. Hartman, partners, doing business as Webster & Hartman, defendants in error, sued J. M. Crutchfield, plaintiff in error, before a justice of the peace in and for Broken Arrow, Tulsa county, for $160 commission alleged to have been earned on a sale of 160 acres of land listed with them by defendant, to be sold for $40 per acre. After answer to their bill of particulars, there was trial and judgment, and an appeal to the county court. There a trial anew resulted in judgment for plaintiffs for the sum. sued, and defendant brings the case here.

At the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McInteer v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Birch v. McNaughtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gilliland v. JaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Wheelan v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Wallace v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API