Legal Opinion

In re Vassall

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 2, 1931No. 220PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

On October 24,1928, Lola Nydia Vassall, the appellee, filed her petition for naturalization, accompanied by the usual affidavits of two witnesses, who each swore that they had personally known the petitioner to have resided in the United States continuously for more than five years preceding the date of filing the petition. The preliminary hearing was held pursuant to title 8, § 399a, US'CA, before an Examiner of the Bureau of Naturalization, who reported that the petition should not be granted because of an “incompetent witness”; his report being accompanied…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tutun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. GinsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Maney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. United States v. MartoranaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
  5. United States v. GulliksenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Francesco Brancato v. John M. Lehmann, Officer in Charge, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  2. United States ex rel. Brancato v. LehmannDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1955
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Francesco Brancato v. John M. Lehmann, Officer in Charge, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API