Legal Opinion

United States v. Zatkova

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 11, 2011No. Slip Op. 11-102; Court 10-00071PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLACH, Judge:

I

INTRODUCTION

The United States (“Plaintiff’ or “Government”) seeks to collect civil penalties plus interest, costs, and attorney fees from Ilona Zatkova (“Defendant”) for allegedly attempting to enter or introduce glass nail files from the Czech Republic into United States commerce in violation of 19 U.S.C. §§ 1484, 1485, and 1592. Plaintiffs Complaint (“Plaintiffs Complaint”), Doc. No. 3 at 1-2. Pursuant to USCIT Rule 12(b)(2), Defendant requests that the court dismiss Plaintiffs complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction because Plaintiff failed to properly serve…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Friedman v. Estate of PresserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Sara A. Karlsson v. Baruch RabinowitzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  5. Stephen Borzeka v. Margaret O. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Koehler Oberkirch GmbHUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025
  2. United States v. HoUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  3. United States v. Koehler Oberkirch GmbHUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API