Legal Opinion
United States v. Ho
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 27, 2020No. 19-00102Published
1Opinion of the Court
Slip Op. 20- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, Before: Timothy M. Reif, Judge v. Court No. 19-00102 CHU-CHIANG “KEVIN” HO, ET AL., Defendants. OPINION [Granting plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time for Service and denying defendant’s Motion to Quash Service of Process and to Dismiss Pursuant to USCIT Rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(5).] Dated: April 27, 2020 William George Kanellis, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice of Washington, D.C. for plaintiff. With him on the brief was Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Zapata v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Thompson v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United Food Workers Union, Locals 197, 373, 428, 588, 775, 839, 870, 1119, 1179 & 1532 v. Alpha Beta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.