United States v. Huckabee
Supreme Court of the United States
' Error to the Circuit Court for the Middle District of Alabama; the case being'thus : , In the year 1862, soon after the outbreak of the late rebellion, one C. C. Huckabee and three other persons, formed under the general, laws of Alabadla a corporation called “The Bibb County Iron Company;” Huckabee being president, and the other corporators, directors; and, with' him, the. only stockholders. , As tbe name of the corporation indicates,-its object was the working in iron;…
Read the full summary
' Error to the Circuit Court for the Middle District of Alabama; the case being'thus : , In the year 1862, soon after the outbreak of the late rebellion, one C. C. Huckabee and three other persons, formed under the general, laws of Alabadla a corporation called “The Bibb County Iron Company;” Huckabee being president, and the other corporators, directors; and, with' him, the. only stockholders. , As tbe name of the corporation indicates,-its object was the working in iron; its. particular hpachinery being such as made it capable of manufacturing cannon, and other munitions of war.…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clifford
Pleadings, in informations for seizures upon land, or for confiscation of property, as well as .in causes of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction-, or in actions at law, or suits in equity, are governed by certain well-established rules, of practice, which require that the allegations shall correspond with the facts as proved, and that the information, as in the case of-a libel, declaration, or bill of complaint, if. filed in a Federal court, shall show that the court has jurisdiction of the cause of action. † Proper parties in all cases are also required, and in all cases, except where there…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- United States v. PerchemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Schooner Hoppet & Cargo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Central Bank v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
- The Mary AnnSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Downes v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- United States v. CorrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Galusha v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Freer v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.