Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Clinton

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 12, 1996No. 1 CA-CV 95-0559PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTOPHER M. SKELLY, Judge. 1

This appeal addresses whether an employee who was intoxicated while driving on the job and who failed to heed his co-worker’s order to stop the vehicle was acting outside the scope of his employment. We hold that the trial court correctly concluded that the employee was within the scope of his employment and that the co-worker’s exclusive remedy against the employee is workers’ compensation benefits.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Appellant Reneé Ortiz and Appellee Jeremy Clinton worked for Hozhoni Foundation for the Handicapped, Inc. (“Hozhoni”). Hozhoni…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Saala v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Smith v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. GilbertArizona Supreme Court · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McCloud v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Higgins v. Assmann Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Crouse Ex Rel. CrouseAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Salerno v. EspinozaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. Engler v. Gulf Interstate Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API