Legal Opinion

Douglas v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 2009No. S-12857PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*314OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

After Ty Douglas repeatedly and egregiously misbehaved during pretrial hearings for two years, the trial court excluded him from the courtroom during his jury trial on charges of witness tampering and unlawful contact, but allowed him to participate by speakerphone. Midtrial Douglas asked to testify in person. The trial court denied this request after finding that Douglas's promise to behave was not credible. After Douglas was convicted, the court of appeals affirmed. Douglas has petitioned for hearing.

A trial court may exelude a criminal defendant for…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. Eddie Lee AnthonyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Alaska Public Defender Agency v. Superior CourtAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. CantuSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. Adam Charles Dere v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
  5. Stansberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API