Gale v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
1. A charge of the court which might "impress upon an obstinate juror never to yield to the argument or reasoning of his fellow-jurors” is improper. Maddox v. State, 233 Ga. 874 (2) (213 SE2d 654). A question directed by an attorney to jurors on voir dire, slanted to elicit the answer that they would "never compromise your opinion even though eleven members of a jury will try to convince you otherwise” was properly disallowed on objection for the same reason. The sustaining of the objection was not ground for a mistrial as contended.
2. The defendant never denied that he…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- State v. McNeillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leonard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Conner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Timberlake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.