Legal Opinion

Gale v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1976No. 51899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

1. A charge of the court which might "impress upon an obstinate juror never to yield to the argument or reasoning of his fellow-jurors” is improper. Maddox v. State, 233 Ga. 874 (2) (213 SE2d 654). A question directed by an attorney to jurors on voir dire, slanted to elicit the answer that they would "never compromise your opinion even though eleven members of a jury will try to convince you otherwise” was properly disallowed on objection for the same reason. The sustaining of the objection was not ground for a mistrial as contended.

2. The defendant never denied that he…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  4. State v. McNeillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Leonard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Conner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Timberlake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API