Legal Opinion

Peterson v. California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 17, 2010No. 09-15633PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

Neil Peterson appeals the district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings to the County of Nevada in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Peterson alleged that California Proposition 115 (“Prop. 115”), the Crime Victims Justice Reform Act, violates his constitutional rights under the Fourth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

I

Prop. 115, which was adopted by California voters in 1990, added both constitutional and statutory language to permit a probable cause determination at a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Mitchell-HunterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  2. State v. Charles E. ButtsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. United States v. HernandezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
  4. State v. Glenn T. ZamzowWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API