Fong Chen v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General and Board of Immigration Appeals
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
In Shou Yung Guo v. Gonzales, 463 F.3d 109 (2d Cir.2006), this court discussed three documents that “apparently reflecte ] the adoption of a new policy in Changle City,” in the Fujian Province of the People’s Republic of China. Id. at 114. Two of the documents, allegedly 2003 decisions from the Changle City Family-Planning Board and Fujian Province Department of Family-Planning Administration (“2003 decisions”), stated, in effect, that foreign-born children will be counted in determining violations of the one-child policy, and that Chinese nationals who have children abroad will be treated…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander Twum v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Wei Guang Wang v. Board of Immigration AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Jian Xing Huang v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Gonzales v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- He v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- C-W-LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
- Zhi Yun Gao v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Cipto Chandra v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Mekhael v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.