Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. Thomas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 17, 2006No. 05-552PublishedCited by 401 opinions

1Per curiam

The Immigration and Nationality Act authorizes the Attorney General to grant an alien asylum if the alien cannot return to another country because of “persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” § 101(a)(42)(A), as added, §201, 94 Stat. 102, 8 U. S. C. § 1101(a)(42)(A) (emphasis added). The respondents, Michelle Thomas and her immediate family, applied for asylum. They checked boxes on the application form that indicated their claim rested upon fear of persecution in their native…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by401 opinions

  1. Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Shi Liang Lin v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Manzur v. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Biao Yang v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

396 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API