Legal Opinion
He v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 4, 2007No. 05-74930PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
Chang Hua He and Xin Qin He (“Mr. He” and “Mrs. He,” respectively) petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denial of their second motion to reopen their immigration proceedings. The BIA concluded that the Hes’ motion did not fall within any exception to the regulatory bar against motions to reopen that are untimely or successive. Because the birth of two of the Hes’ children in the United States cannot establish changed circumstances in the petitioners’ country of origin, here the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or “China”), within the meaning of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wei Guang Wang v. Board of Immigration AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Ranjit Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Jian Lian Guo v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Xiao Xing Ni v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Yuen Jin v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Najmabadi v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- C-W-LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
- Qing Li Chen v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Yan Xia Zhang v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.