Legal Opinion
State v. Brunori
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 24, 1990No. 7836PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of General Statutes § 21a-267 (a), and possession of a narcotic substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a). The dis-positive issue is whether the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal.1 We conclude that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient as a matter of law to support the guilty verdicts. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s judgment.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. On the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. KimbroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. AlfonsoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Carroll v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. MoodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. OsmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. JordanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. BarberConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. OberConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.