Legal Opinion
United States v. Ernest G. Moore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1990No. 87-3626PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Moore appeals pro se the denial of his section 2255 motion. He alleges his incarceration is illegal because his convictions were based on insufficient evidence, error in jury instructions, ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel, and improper denial of an evidentiary hearing on this motion. We affirm.
FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
In 1977, an informant, Krossman, told the FBI that Moore and others planned to rob a bank in Milwaukie, Oregon. The FBI provided Krossman with a “stolen” car that the others expected to use in the robbery. FBI agents waited…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Crystal Mason, Edward YoungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. William Buffington, Ceariaco Cabrellis, and Booker T. Cook, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Daniel Eugene Frazer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Totten v. MerkleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Mark Kevin HicksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Monico DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Trina Devay Harper, United States of America v. Aziz SharrieffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.