Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lingle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1935No. Appeal, 397PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The defendant was indicted for 'statutory’ rape. He pleaded 'not guilty’ and went to trial. The jury disagreed. When the case came up for trial the second time, the defendant moved to quash the indictment, because the information, on which it was founded, failed to state that the offense had been committed in Lebanon County.

The indictment charged that the crime had been committed in Lebanon County, and all the evidence on the first trial, with respect to the commission of the crime, fixed Lebanon County as the scene of the offense.

The court below refused to quash the indictment and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DingmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Commonwealth v. BrennanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Commonwealth v. KeeganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Commonwealth v. SchoenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WiswesserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ketter v. DaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth v. HicksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Jenkins v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Commonwealth v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API