Henry Pierson & Sons v. Gohr
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Gorter, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The following are the prayers offered by the plaintiff, and the ruling of the Court thereon: Pltff's 1st Prayer—The plaintiff prays the Court to instruct the jury that if they shall find a verdict for the plaintiff, then in estimating the damages, they are to consider his health and condition before the injury complained of as-compared with his present condition in…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Gorter, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The following are the prayers offered by the plaintiff, and the ruling of the Court thereon: Pltff's 1st Prayer—The plaintiff prays the Court to instruct the jury that if they shall find a verdict for the plaintiff, then in estimating the damages, they are to consider his health and condition before the injury complained of as-compared with his present condition in consequence of said injury, and whether the same is in its nature permanent, and how. far, if at all, it is calculated to disable…
1Opinion of the Court
Boyd, 0. J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This action was originally against Harry A. Brown and these appellants, and a verdict was rendered against them for $350.00. Each of them made a motion for a new trial and the motion was granted as to Henry Pierson & Sons and overruled as to Brown. A judgment was entered against Brown on that verdict, but no question is presented by the record as to that. The case was re-tried against Henry Pierson & Sons, and a verdict for $500.00 was rendered against them. This appeal is from a judgment entered on that verdict.
One exception was taken to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Deford v. State ex rel. KeyserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Weilbacher v. J. W. Putts Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- City & Suburban Railway Co. v. MooresCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. HengerTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. City of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. LevequeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Donohue v. George W. Stiles Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1919
- Living, Inc. v. Redinger, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.