Legal Opinion
State v. City of Baltimore
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 1, 1993No. [No. 93, October Term, 1951.]PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.
These two cases arise out of the accidental death of a workman in the course of the construction of a Water Tunnel Project in Baltimore City. Suits were instituted against the City and Rosoff. A demurrer by the City to the third amended declaration was sustained without leave to amend. Trial of the cases against Rosoff resulted in directed verdicts in favor of the defendant and judgments thereon. There is little dispute as to the facts and they may be briefly stated.
The Water Tunnel Project, designed to bring water into the City from the Patapsco River Valley, called for the construction of a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Deford v. State ex rel. KeyserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Le Vonas v. Acme Paper Board Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Salmon v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Purkable v. Greenland Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- State v. Benjamin F. Bennett Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Honaker v. W. C. & A. N. Miller Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Brady v. Ralph Parsons Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Roland Ex Rel. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Lloyd E. Mitchell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Krieger v. J. E. Greiner Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Donohue v. Maryland Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.