Legal Opinion

Lloyds Casualty Insurer v. Farrar

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 20, 1942No. Nos. 13312, 13339PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

The suit in the trial court was by Far-rar, appellee, surety on a supersedeas bond in another cause where M. V. Mowery, John White and H. J. - Yarborough were judgment creditors; the instant proceedings being for contribution and exoneration against Lloyds Casualty Insurer, an alleged “additional surety” in the Mowery appeal. There are, in fact, two records before us: Lloyds having perfected an appeal from the overruling of its plea of privilege; and a further appeal from an adverse judgment on the merits. However, consistent with appellant’s rights, and after necessary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moore v. HanscomTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Gulf, West Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. WittnebertTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Smith v. ChipleyTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Glasscock v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Continental Oil Co. v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Business Credit v. Ben Kozloff, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. El Paso Assoc., Ltd. v. JR Thurman & Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1990
  3. Boyd v. Leasing Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Southwest Title Insurance Co. v. Northland Building Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Lloyds Casualty Insurer v. FarrarTexas Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API