Sellers v. Public Savings Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Bussey, Justice.
In this action the respondent, as the beneficiary of a policy issued by appellant on the life of her husband George Sellers, seeks to recover the sum of $750.00, double indemnity or accidental death benefit. There was a verdict of the jury favorable to the respondent and the insurer appeals, asserting several errors, including error in denying its motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.
As will hereinafter appear, we are of the view that there was no error in denying appellant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. but hold that there was, in the course of the trial, prejudicial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kanne v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Sturm v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1918
- Buckley v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Davis v. SparksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- State v. StockmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fields v. Regional Medical Center OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Rutledge v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985