Kanne v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett
In a suit to recover double indemnity under a combination life and accident insurance policy, there was trial by jury with verdict for defendant. On plaintiffs’ motion judgment notwithstanding was entered in favor of plaintiffs for $2,200.
The procedure was under section 68 (3a) of the Civil Practice Act (Smith-Hurd Ann. Stats., ch. 110, par. 192, p. 681 [Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 104.068]), and Rule 22 of the Supreme Court (Smith-Hurd Ann. Stats., ch. 110, § 259.22, p. 547 [Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 105.22]).
For reversal defendant argues error in excluding evidence offered by it and in entering…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Manufacturers' Accident Indemnity Co. v. DorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Lyons v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Plano Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Keefe v. Armour & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Sturm v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Paul Harris Furniture Co. v. MorseIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Gowdy v. RichterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Baird v. AdeliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Carlson v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Baird v. AdeliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.