Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. Sterling Heights Police & Fire Department Civil Service Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1978No. Docket 77-4380, 77-4381PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtB. M. Hensick, J.

Intervening defendant, Officer Carl Timm, employed by the Sterling Heights Police Department, was suspended from his job. He appealed to defendant Civil Service Commission of the City of Sterling Heights. The commission ruled that the suspension was improper and ordered that Officer Timm be reinstated with back pay and that no charges be officially recorded.

Plaintiff, Sterling Heights City Manager, filed a complaint for superintending control in Macomb County Circuit Court seeking reversal of defendant’s decision. The trial court reversed the commission, stating that it had committed an error…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Viculin v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Pritchard v. State, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Department of Health & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. Rouveyrol v. DonnellySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. State ex rel. Broadway Petroleum Corp. v. City of ElyriaOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Mortensen v. Pyramid Savings & Loan Ass'n of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robertson v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Beer v. City of Fraser Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Eckstein v. KuhnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. O'Connor v. Oakland County Sheriff's DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Eckstein v. KuhnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API