Legal Opinion

Eckstein v. Kuhn

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1987No. Docket 78760PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

On August 9, 1982, plaintiff was *242dismissed as Assistant Chief Engineer of the Oakland County Drain Office. As a county employee, he was employed under the county’s merit system. Rule 8 of the merit system provides that disciplinary action, including discharge, shall be for cause. The preamble to Rule 8 describes "a formal appeal procedure” for disciplined "regular status” employees to the Personnel Appeal Board (pab), "whose decisions shall be binding on such employees and departments.” Under the rules, the pab has the authority to modify, reverse, or affirm disciplinary action, and to award…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Viculin v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Evans v. United States Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hilden v. Hurley Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  2. Smith v. Gentiva Health Services (USA) Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  3. James v. HRP, INC.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994
  4. O'Connor v. Oakland County Sheriff's DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Beaver v. Macomb CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API